As well as bans for three players, it also hastened the departures of coach Darren Lehmann and CA chief executive James Sutherland.
He seemed to be fixated with the whole "Smile with us, Dream with us" comment in the "Players' Pact" that was released by Tim Paine and Josh Hazlewood after the cultural review.
"Arrogant", "controlling" and hell-bent on "winning at all costs". "The other thing is there's indications in there around how negative feedback is not well taken [by CA] and in some cases players decided they didn't want to do it and referred through us, and we compiled an appropriate submission".
"Quite rightly the players are going to be angry about that, the fact it's only them who copped it in the neck".
It has been a hard and confronting time for everyone involved in Australian Cricket, and for that I am sorry.
CA reverted "to bully tactics or worse, ostracising" when situations went "against them", according to one unnamed insider. "So the sanctions stand", said Peever.
In a written response, CA says it will review its selection responsibilities in response to this.
"You're never going to have a game of cricket played where opposition aren't going to speak to each other".
There's no doubt that the ball-tampering incident in South Africa was extremely regrettable and caused distress across our country.
It detailed CA's failings, some of which were said to be unintended consequences resulting from the 2011 Argus review that was compiled to address poor on-field performance.
"In our opinion, CA's fault is not that it established a culture of "win at all costs".
Dyer said this "new evidence" should have an impact on the trio's bans and, given the sanctions were handed down without knowledge of the wider picture, they should be recalibrated.
"Most resent being seen as a product or asset", the report said. Reports also add that Jason used the word "disgrace".
The 145-page report conducted by The Ethics Centre found a disconnect between state associations and the national body, while sponsors believed their value to the organisation was only measured in financial terms.
It also wants an Australian Cricket Council configured, with key figures from the sport to meet twice a year to consider "issues of strategic significance" to the sport. Tellingly, the CA Board has already declined a recommendation to publicise the Minutes of its regular meetings, with commercial-in-confidence information removed.
"The most common description of CA is as arrogant and controlling". This may involve mediation.
Speed said on Tuesday that "the game deserves better leadership", calling for Mark Taylor to be elevated from his director's role to the chairmanship. Players with leadership aspirations have been recommended to undertake formal training, including to help improve their "moral courage".
"It's not a hiccup, it's much more than that", Speed, who was chief executive of the Australian cricket board from 1997 until 2001 before serving a similar role at the global governing body, told ABC radio. It's been six months since South Africa. Howard had been criticised for his involvement.
On Monday, the CA chairman, David Peever, said he accepted full responsibility for the ball-tampering scandal but he remained adamant he would not step down from his position.